African Mud Huts Are Great Civilizations, Yet European Mud Huts Are Pre-Civilization Barbarians?
If historical and scientific definitions can be varied randomly by feelings towards certain groups, they’re not scientific. They are agenda based propaganda.
PC definitions are inconsistent thus not scientific:
Why were the Great Zimbabwe ruins not replicated anywhere else in central and southern Africa? Where are the subsequent advanced cities in southern and central Africa that are so evident in Europe? Why are the scientifically defining characteristics of ancient cities, such as consistent written laws, not applicable to definitions of civilization in southern and central Africa? They’re not exactly wimp, so what gives?
After centuries of Bantu expansion by invasion and genocidal conquest, where is the evidence of their great civilization?
Certainly not ending in the profitable slave trade they violently fought to continue.
Certainly not in the amazing infrastructure that began appearing within months of the White man reaching Rhodesia – like the wheel, roads, the telegraph and within a few years, electricity and the greatest hydro-electric dam scheme on planet earth!
In fact, the traditional Chiefs and Headsmen, having finally experienced peace and progress, voted for Rhodesia to be an independent nation and fully backed PM Ian Smith. It was the “civilised international financiers” that disagreed. Coincidentally the same cabal that owns the media inciting division in America and the rest of the West today….