The British Monarchy Are Servants, But Not Of The People…

For most Rhodesians the question is not did British Royalty betray their trust and loyalty, but why. As demonstrated in the prior article Rhodesians of all races had loyally served Britain whenever called. They believed they were honourably fighting, killing and dying for the British Monarch of the day. Within a handful of years that monarchy did a 180 degree flip and helped turn the world against those very men and their sons. Why?

Regular contributing author Linde provided this illuminating response, and the relevance today is devastatingly clear:

The Firm, The Cabal & The Hierarchy

I tend to think that the British monarchy (aka The Firm, perfidious as it is) knows who are The Owners and who underwrites the royal style and duties. In terms of The Firm and The Cabal -it is the latter are The Owners.

In “The Battle for Rhodesia” Douglas Reed devotes an entire chapter to Cecil Rhodes negotiation of peace between the traditional enemies: the Matabele and the Shona. The raiding , slaving wars for the Caliphate on the Gold Coast of Africa had been going for centuries but Rhodes made the peace between these peoples. According to Reed, they called it “the separation of the fighting bulls”.

The Matabele honoured Cecil Rhodes, gave him a Kings burial and posted guards to protect his grave – even from Marxist Mugabe thugs.

This peace is an important part of Rhodesia’s Westminster tradition and the Rhodes’ patrimony. It became part of the foundation of the Rhodesian state as a Crown Colony.

The British monarchy and later the Union of the Two Crowns of the Stewart monarchy is ‘The Crown’ to which Magna Carta and Westminster Law refers. This was not, however, the foundation of the UK – laid on the Bank of England 1694 and The City of London Corporation.

In 1642, the English Parliamentarians laid the axe to the root of Magna Carta and fought the Union of the Two Crowns under Charles I for ‘the Supremacy’ which was demanded by Henry VIII in the Oath 1558 – a power claimed by the British monarch since the Act of the Supremacy 1559. There might have been ‘royal prerogative’ since King Alfred the Great (and this is recognized in Magna Carta), but there was no ‘Supremacy’. Rather the best of Westminster is a rule of law, qualified democratic franchise and balance of powers.

After the Civil War 1642, the Parliamentarians had ‘the Supremacy’ for what it was worth (in law or de jure) and they wear the chains of that office to this day. It remains, however, a very qualified ‘supremacy’. The real power lies with the Owners of the consols of the Bank of England and The City of London Corporation. This is the de facto and ‘right of conquest’ supremacy. This is the Judaic Imperium.

But the British monarch fronts the new regime.

This map of London from 1815 marks the City of London Corporation in pink.

Just as the US has been under the Admiralty Law of The City of London Corporation since 1913, in the formation of the UK ( the Coronation Oath 1688, the Act of Union, Succession and Settlement 1701 – 1707 ) the UK is under Admiralty Law and not Westminster Law. In all conflict of law, Admiralty Law has the precedence.

However, it is Westminster law and government which is the true Christian greatness of the English nation. Rhodes was well schooled in the traditions of Westminster at Oxford and he brought the best of them to Africa in the founding of Rhodesia. Rhodesia always exemplified the best of Westminster through this patrimony and the statesmanship of PM Ian Smith and the Rhodesian Front government. And the Rhodesians got themselves free of the UK with their Declaration of Independence and free of the central banking cartel with the establishment of the Reserve Bank of Rhodesia 1970.

Against the Communist Revolution of the twentieth century these are titanic achievements.

Fiercely anti-Communist: The opening ceremony of Rhodesian parliament.

Under the UK, ‘the Crown’ as it applies to the monarch is a mere designation of the the power for which the British monarch stands in relation as a figurehead or a legal fiction. The Crown de facto and by right of Conquest (War of the Succession 1688 – 1745) are The Owners of The City of London Corporation (and its world money pyramid). And they are The Owners of the Communist Revolution: both the Western Sickle and the Eastern Hammer.

A charade within in a charade: Masking itself as part of the Crown the City of London Corporation has always demanded that the Queen (or King) asks permission to enter its territory.

The British Monarchy and the US Dept of State have been onboard with the Communist Revolution since the UN was raised up on its Communist Charter (every plank of the Manifesto) and the Fourth Comintern inaugurated its permanent world Revolution with World War II (for which no armistice ever was signed).

“We are one people despite the ostensible rifts , cracks and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved Eastern nations , the West would inevitably deprive Jewry of the Eastern half of its world power.”

Chaim Weizmann (Marschalko, Louis. The World Conquerors)

Who is the City of London Corporation’s ‘head of the snake’?

A Rothschild with his servant?

Consider the following evidence, for ‘by their fruits ye shall know them’:

1) Paul Warburg worked closely with the Rothschilds, and was a founder of the private bank the U.S. Federal Reserve and advisor (read ‘controller’) to FDR. International Jewish banker James Warburg, the son of Paul Warburg who worked closely with the Rothschilds, speaking before a U.S. Senate Committee in 1950:

We shall have world government, whether or not we [read ‘you’] like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.” 

2) Before the Bolshevik Revolution, Jewish banker Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn, Loeb Co (a Rothschild bank in the U.S.) sent his agent, George Kennan, to regularly tour Russia as early as the latter part of the 19th century, to bring in money and arms for the Communist revolutionaries. His grandson later said that Schiff had coughed up $20 million for this purpose. Jacob Schiff was born in the Rothschild family home in Germany which was shared by the two families.

3) In 1967, while Rhodesia experienced enforced UN economic sanctions against it ‘for democracy’, the New York Times announced that a new consortium had been formed to promote trade with the anti-democratic, One Party State of Marxist Russia, composed of Cyrus Eaton’s Tower Corp., Rockefeller’s International Basic Economy Corp., and N.M. Rothschild & Sons of London. 

4) Hearst’s Chicago Evening American commented, December 3, 1923:

“The Rothschilds can start or prevent wars. Their word could make or break empires.”

The Rothschild/Anglo-Boer War was a Holocaust for gold fields.

5) David Rockefeller:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years … It would have been impossible for us to develop our Plan for the World if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated[read ‘dumbed down’] and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

What Is The ‘Head Of The Snake’ Up To Now?

Who decides who are the right people? Who decides where is the right place? Who decides the right time? The United Nations and Zimbabwe are only two disastrous results from people trusting this type of carefully crafted propaganda.
Out of the engineered chaos currently destroying millions of businesses and jobs, comes a New Order you did not ASK or VOTE for. The real viruses are Fear and Willful Ignorance.

Recommended reading: The VigilantCitizen’s review of the Great Reset video linked above. For example, he highlights their statement in this image of a fake newspaper that fades too fast for us to read in full.


The Great Reset is well-documented.

The Great Reset has been labeled a conspiracy theory and parts of it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but everything we know about it comes from the global elites themselves, who have been quite open about it.

“This is not a conspiracy theory, this is a well-documented movement among many of the world’s most powerful people,” says Justin Haskins, the editorial director at the Heartland Institute and a leading authority on the Great Reset, “fundamentally, this is a radical and complete transformation of everything that we do in our society,” Haskins adds, “it will change the way businesses are evaluated, it will coerce businesses to pursue left-wing causes.”

The Great Reset was unveiled at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where many of the world’s most powerful people go to offer solutions to the world’s problems. They have said that the coronavirus pandemic as a historic opportunity to change the way the world operates.

COVID-19 pandemic as an “opportunity” to change everything.

A World Economic Forum video warns, “Right now we’re facing a crisis of international proportions. It’s going to have a long-term impact on us”.

And their solution is essentially global socialism. Think of the Green New Deal combined with the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and throw in something called the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in which technology is supposed to radically change the way we live and work.

Haskins says: “The elites, the technocrats in society, the most educated people”, see the chance to “control and manipulate society, pull the levers in society so that it’s in their minds, perfect.”

Share, re-blog and print options:

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll Up