Debunking the ‘Out of Africa’ Theory: Rare footage of the Sub-Saharan Dinka Peoples’ Primitive Culture Prior to Colonialism

After the Bantu people, the Dinkas are the second largest population in the sub-Saharan Great Lakes regions. The Dinkas are the tallest people in Africa. Robert Sepehr provides an astonishing rare 15 minute footage on the pre-colonial Dinkas’ culture.

by Sally-Ann Lowe, introducing anthropologist Robert Sepehr

Robert Sepehr:

Sudan is a country in Northeast Africa, bordered by Egypt to the north, Libya to the northwest, Chad to the west, the Central African Republic to the southwest, Ethiopia to the southeast, and the Red Sea to the northeast. The Dinka people live in the savanna country surrounding the central swamps of the Nile basin primarily in South Sudan. Primarily pastoralists, they live very close to their cows, which were introduced into Africa from Eurasia several millennia ago.

It would be even more interesting to know of their culture prior to the introduction of cattle to Africa from Eurasia!

The study of genetics is a more recent tool in the study of human evolution. Old worn theories being perpetuated as ‘facts’ are no longer viable yet still being taught and promoted. This implies political motives rule over scientific accuracy. The following 15 minute video holds a few surprises.

Robert Sepehr on Darwin’s DNA Dilemma and debunking the ‘Out of Africa’ evolution theory:

Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations (random mutation) that increase the individual’s ability to compete, survive, and reproduce.

Share, re-blog and print options:

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. WakeyWakey says:

    Robert Sepehr’s videos can be found mainly on youtube where he has a large number of subscribers (368,000) that enjoy his informative videos, here:

    “Mummy DNA of Ancient Egypt”
    and What were Blue Eyed People Doing in Northern Israel 6,500 years ago?
    In this his latest video, he reveals that the ancient Egyptians share affinities with Europeans, Anatolians, and fair-skinned people of the ancient Middle East, the earliest pharoes’ mummies were blond or red haired White people and their ancient statues of their nobility had blue eyes.

  2. Linde says:

    Thank you to Sally-Ann Lowe for keeping us posted and Wakey-Wakey for the link. Bringing the human genome project to history is going to put the final nails in the coffin of Darwinian theory.

  3. Linde says:

    Only White Africans will be able to keep the power on in the nations they once built. The infrastructure of these failed Marxist states is decaying but the ruins can be rebuilt by people who know how to build and engineer. Primitive tribes will not be able to produce the agriculture and industry that is required by large populations.

    The Zimbabwean Communists may have sold the country of the former Rhodesia to China, but China is not going to keep the power on for even the industrial district of ‘Harare’. It is going to ration the power to the blood diamond and rare earth mines of Israel.

    NB. With respect to Jan who fought for Rhodesia, I do not agree that ‘the worse the better’ is the position that the Western Counter Revolution should take toward failed Marxist states like Zimbabwe, Zambia etc.

    • WakeyWakey says:

      Yes. everything continues to go backwards unless the international Cryptocracy is injecting funds and creating projects that tie in with their NWO plans. As third worlders are continuously flooded into White nations, the futures in these countries will also deteriorate. Somewhere in South Africa I believe China built its own power grid but not for the local plebs of course. Although Jan was too young to fight for Rhodesia his older brother did.

  4. Rock 'n' Rhodie with me Vellies On says:

    Interesting perspective. I did Anthropology at Cambridge in the late 80’s, failed to accept the then ubiquitous left wing establishment’s ‘anti-race’ assumptions, introduced ‘deconstructionalism’ to oppose them (how ironic!), and dumped it in ’94 when it became post modernism. In favour of ‘Reconstructionalism’, which holds that genetic randomism is merely misunderstanding the SYSTEMATIC complexities involved. ‘Nature’ has finally caught up on that has it? I might have to re-send them my systematic Amino Acid formation description! Systematic being ‘replicable, describable and regular’, as opposed to the random/quantum/ineffable drivel that suffices for the scientifically semi-educated. I have just been reading FC Selous’s accounts of hunting in Rhodesia in the 1880’s. Selous managed to work out the tri partite sub saharan African racial divide: Bantu, Pygmy, and Bushmen within ‘minutes’ of arriving in Bantu terrorized territory south of the Zambesi! Probably read Herodotus- its there too! Bizarrely enough, the obvious question: ‘How does modern genetics relate these three to a common ancestor, and how do the ‘out of Africa’ aspects relate to this, has strangely managed to avoid being clarified for nearly 30 years…
    Funny that… who would gain by closing down the origin of modern ‘humans’ anthropological research, or making self censorship the academic optimum in this field?

    Follow the money as usual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll Up