How WWII Destroyed Rhodesia: “Stalin’s War: A New History of WWII”

“President Roosevelt opened a virtually unlimited credit line (initially $1 billion) to order whatever Stalin desired, in exchange for nothing whatsoever. This $1 billion of strategic exports to Stalin were made without Congressional approval or the American public being informed about it… Remarkably, lend-lease aid to the Soviet Union continued after Germany had been defeated…The Soviet wartime debts were written off in 1951 at two cents on the dollar. By contrast, Great Britain paid its debts in full, with interest, until 2006.”

Editor: This is an insightful review of Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II. It is essential reading for Rhodesians trying to understand why and how we were betrayed by the West. For those unfamiliar with the real nature of the Bush War in Rhodesia, it was an invasion by Soviet and CCP forces using proxy armies to reignite tribal conflicts:

Comintern forces on our borders.

Review of Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II

by John Wear

      Sean McMeekin is a professor of history at Bard College in upstate New York. Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II is McMeekin’s latest book that focuses on Josef Stalin’s involvement in World War II. This well-researched and well-written book uses new research in Soviet, European and American archives to prove that World War II was a war that Stalin—not Adolf Hitler—had wanted.

      A remarkable feature of Stalin’s War is McMeekin’s documentation showing the extensive aid given by the United States and Great Britain to support Soviet Communism during the war. This article focuses on the lend-lease and other aid given to the Soviet Union during World War II which enabled Stalin to conquer most of Eurasia, from Berlin to Beijing, for Communism.    

Communist Agents Promote Stalin

      Numerous people sympathetic to Communism and Josef Stalin rose to prominence in U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt’s administration. Among these were Alger Hiss, who was identified by decrypted Soviet telegrams (the Venona files) released to the public in the 1990s as having collaborated with Soviet military intelligence (the GRU). More highly placed was Harry Dexter White, who rose rapidly to become the right-hand man of Henry Morgenthau, Roosevelt’s powerful secretary of the Treasury. Venona decrypts show that White worked for the GRU as early as 1935, and later reported directly to Soviet functionaries working for the People’s Commissariat of Internal Affairs (NKVD).[1]  

Alger Hiss (pictured), a well-educated and well-connected former government lawyer and State Department official who helped create the United Nations in the aftermath of World War II was a Soviet spy. FBI online report here.
Harry Dexter White was a senior U.S. Department of Treasury official. He was the first head of the International Monetary Fund and played an important role in formation of the World Bank. He was also a Soviet secret agent—”the most highly-placed asset the Soviets possessed in the American government.” White succeeded in subverting American policy to favor Soviet interests over U.S. interests. Unlike other Comintern [Communist International] operatives such as Alger Hiss or Julius Rosenberg, White died before he could be brought to trial. Consequently, Harry Dexter White’s case has not been publicly scrutinized as closely as the Hiss and Rosenberg cases, yet in some respects, White’s subversion of US foreign policy may have been even more damaging.

      There were hundreds of additional paid Soviet agents working inside the U.S. government by the end of the 1930s. From the Departments of Agriculture and State to the Treasury and the U.S. Army, these Soviet agents were placed highly enough to favorably influence policies that affected the Soviet Union. Soviet agent Whittaker Chambers’s handler reported proudly to Moscow, “We have agents at the very center of government, influencing policy.” These Soviet agents in Washington, D.C. provided Stalin with a critical strategic foothold in the American government as he prepared the Soviet Union for war.[2]

      Roosevelt did everything he could to improve relations with Stalin. In November 1936, Roosevelt appointed a Soviet sympathizer, Joseph Davies, as his ambassador in Moscow, after U.S. Ambassador William Bullitt had become openly critical of Stalin’s regime. Roosevelt also purged the U.S. State Department of anti-Communists in 1937.[3] McMeekin writes:

“Reading through the minutes of Harry Hopkins’s Soviet protocol from 1943, it is hard to escape the impression that Soviet agents of influence had taken over the White House.”[4]

      Stalin-friendly journalists such as Walter Duranty of the New York Times and fellow travelers such as George Bernard Shaw also helped cover-up Soviet crimes such as the famine-genocide of the early 1930s and the Great Terror. By contrast, they emphasized German crimes such as the Röhm purge and Kristallnacht. This double standard, when it comes to the public exposure of the crimes of Hitler and Stalin, has continued in the historical literature to this day.[5]

Forced famines are a Marxist-Maoist tactic to control people who do not want to vote them into permanent power.

      The cover-up of the Soviet executions of Polish citizens is a prime example of how Soviet crimes were ignored. McMeekin writes:

      The number of victims murdered by Soviet authorities in occupied Poland by June 1941—about 500,000—was likewise three or four times higher than the number of those killed by the Nazis. Amazingly—despite his own war of conquest against Poland being, if not as deadly as Hitler’s during its military phase, then marked by a geometrically larger number of executions and deportations and far more destruction in economic terms—the Vozhd (Stalin) received not even a slap on the wrist from the Western powers for his crimes.[6]

Lend-Lease Aid Begins

      After the German invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the debate over American aid policy toward Stalin took on world-historical importance, as it had the potential to decide the outcome of the war on the eastern front. While Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill expressed strong support for the Soviet cause, numerous U.S. Congressmen did not share their sentiments. For example, Sen. Robert M. La Follette Jr. warned:

      [I]n the next few weeks the American people will witness the greatest whitewash act in all history. They will be told to forget the purges in Russia by the OGPU [secret police], the persecution of religion, the confiscation of property, the invasion of Finland and the vulture role Stalin played in seizing half of prostrate Poland, all of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. These will be made to seem the acts of a “democracy” preparing to fight Nazism.[7]

      Despite reservations from many U.S. Congressmen and the majority of the American public, powerful figures in the Roosevelt administration had determined that the Soviet Union would receive lend-lease aid. The Soviet embassy placed its first request for American aid on June 30, 1941. It requested $1.8 billion worth of American warplanes, anti-aircraft guns, toluol (the critical input in TNT), aviation gasoline and lubricants. Roosevelt approved this Soviet request in principle on July 8, and established a special office in the War Department to process military supplies destined for Russia.[8]

The American public elected FDR expecting a continuance of the no foreign entanglements policy set by the Founding Fathers. The Lend-Lease Act stated that the U.S. government could lend or lease (rather than sell) war supplies to any nation deemed “vital to the defense of the United States.” Under this policy, the United States was able to supply military aid to foreign nations including the USSR and China.

      In a later meeting in Moscow, U.S. envoy Harry Hopkins asked Stalin what weapons the Red Army most desperately required. Stalin replied that the Red Army needed anti-aircraft guns, large-caliber machine guns, 7.72 mm caliber rifles, aluminum, and 20,000 pieces of anti-aircraft artillery. After Hopkins agreed to these requests, Stalin proceeded to his second-tier requirements, which included fighters, pursuit planes and medium-range bombers. Hopkins also assented to these requests. Later that night, Hopkins met with Stalin’s artillery expert to discuss technical issues.[9]

      Hopkins presented Stalin’s material requests to Roosevelt, along with Stalin’s plea that the United States enter the war. Roosevelt agreed to deliver massive volumes of military weapons to the Soviet Union over the coming months, setting aside 100 large transport vessels exclusively for Stalin’s needs. The terms Roosevelt was offering Stalin for this aid were absurdly generous. Roosevelt opened a virtually unlimited credit line (initially $1 billion) to order whatever Stalin desired, in exchange for nothing whatsoever. This $1 billion of strategic exports to Stalin were made without Congressional approval and the American public being informed about it.[10]

      Despite the United States still being officially neutral in the European war, the Roosevelt administration had gone all in on the Soviet side. Roosevelt’s decision to support Stalin’s war effort in the summer of 1941 was premised on his view that the United States would enter the war against Germany eventually, whether or not most Americans supported Roosevelt’s interventionist policies. These shipments of free aid made a dramatic difference that eventually turned the tide of the entire war in Stalin’s favor.[11]

More Lend-Lease Aid 

      In 1941, the Soviet war industry would not be able to function properly without massive American aid. The United States sent to Stalin’s war factories monthly deliveries of armor plate (1,000 tons), sheet steel (8,000 tons), steel wire (7,000 tons), steel wire rope (1,200 tons), tool steel (500 tons), aluminum ingots (1,000 tons), duralumin (250 tons), tin (4,000 tons), toluol (2,000 tons), ferro chrome (200 tons), ferro silicon (300 tons), rolled brass (5,000 tons), and copper tubes (300 tons).[12]

      The Red Army lost 20,500 tanks between June and November 1941, amounting to 80% of Stalin’s armored strength.[13] The German conquest of industrial areas also caused Soviet tank production to drop from 2,000 to 1,400 tanks per month. Stalin said he needed 2,000 tons of armor plate per month to keep Soviet tank production going at even reduced levels. Roosevelt approved this request, and agreed to supply Stalin with 400 warplanes per month, and monthly shipments of 10,000 American trucks and 5,000 jeeps, 200,000 Red Army boots, 400,000 yards of khaki for uniforms, 1,500 tons of leather hides and boot-sole leather, 200,000 tons of wheat, and 70,000 tons of sugar.[14]

      Despite the massive American aid to the Soviet Union, the Russians were perennially disappointed in the volume of American lend-lease aid being received in Soviet ports. German U-boats, destroyers, and Luftwaffe air raids frequently sent American cargo to the bottom of the northern Atlantic Ocean or Arctic Sea. The perils of Arctic waves, freezing cold, ice and icebergs, snow and fog also made it difficult for American cargo to reach its intended destination.[15]

     Soviet purchasing agents had such influence in the Roosevelt administration that, by the spring and summer of 1942, they functioned like members of the U.S. government. The Lend-Lease Administration provided requisition forms to Soviet purchasing agents identical to those used by the U.S. armed forces. This sped up the processing time of Russian requests from an average of 33.2 days in 1941 to 48 hours by January 1942. For all intents and purposes, Stalin’s agents now had legal writ in the United States over essential war supplies.[16]

      Soviet industrial espionage in the United States took place on a massive scale during World War II. Spying was superfluous in the lend-lease era, as Soviet purchasing agents were allowed to inspect whatever American factories they wished. Soviet purchasing agents could now tell Stalin what to order from the best U.S. aviation factories: Bell, Douglas, and Curtis-Wright. Soviet assets in the U.S. government, like Harry Dexter White, could also casually walk over to the Soviet embassy and suggest reorienting the U.S. machine-tool industry to meet Stalin’s needs. All of these planes, specialized machine tools and other military weapons were delivered to the Soviet Union essentially free of charge.[17]

The domino effect has been devastating.

      Industrial espionage was easy for Soviet agents to conduct in the United States. In addition to giving Soviet buying agents and engineers free rein to inspect American factories and tank-testing facilities, the transfer of entire American factories to the Soviet Union was approved, including their in-house intellectual property. The process began in July and August 1941, when Roosevelt personally approved contracts to have built in the Soviet Union a $4 million tire plant, a $3 million catalytic plant, a $2.75 million hydrogen plant, a $2.2 million cracking and crude distillation plant, a $1.75 million dehydrocyclization plant, a $1.5 million aviation lubricating oil plant, a $4 million aluminum rolling mill, and a $400,000 high-octane gasoline plant.[18]

      Lend-lease sharing with the Soviet Union extended even to top-secret military intelligence. McMeekin writes:

      Lenin had once prophesied that, after the revolution, capitalists would be happy to sell Communists the rope they would use to hang them. And yet not even Lenin could have imagined that American capitalists would hand over the rope free of charge—and not just any rope either.[19]

      On February 18, 1942, Stalin even requested that the U.S. Navy convoy each shipment of war supplies from the East Coast all the way to the Soviet Arctic. Roosevelt granted Stalin’s request. In March 1942, Roosevelt ordered Adm. Emory S. Land to “give Russia first priority in shipping” and take merchant vessels off Latin American and Caribbean routes “regardless of other considerations.” Roosevelt ordered Russian shipments to be prioritized “regardless of the effect…on any other part of our war program.”[20] Thus, Stalin’s requests were given priority over all other military operations.

Lend-Lease Turns War in Stalin’s Favor

      In the first seven or eight months of 1942, the German Luftwaffe dominated Soviet airspace, and German armored divisions enjoyed parity at worst and often considerable local superiority over the Red Army’s depleted supply of tanks. However, once lend-lease supplies began arriving in the Soviet Union in appreciable quantities, the material equation began to shift in Stalin’s favor.[21]

      Interestingly, while much has been written about the superiority of Russian tanks such as the T-34 to comparable American and British models, in private Russian experts conceded that U.S. and British tanks had many positive aspects. American M-3 Stuart light and medium tanks were found to produce a “high density of fire.” The medium Stuart M-3 had “excellent visibility from the perspective of the commander,” while the light M-3 had “superior mobility.” The light and medium Stuart tanks were well designed ergonomically, with “convenient crew placement,” and were quieter than many Soviet models. At Stalin’s request, Roosevelt ordered American tanks to be retrofitted to meet Soviet needs.[22]

      Roosevelt also sent a large number of Jeeps and trucks to help the Red Army. Studebaker trucks were outfitted with 76 mm Red Army guns and placed into immediate use, playing a crucial role in supplying mobile forces deployed beyond railheads. American jeeps proved immensely popular with Russian drivers because of their maneuverability and versatility. In addition to the 36,865 trucks and 6,823 jeeps delivered to the Soviet Union by June 30, 1942, between 25,000 and 30,000 more arrived by mid-November 1942, when the Red Army was preparing its counteroffensive to cut off Stalingrad.[23]

      At Stalin’s request, Roosevelt began sending 5,000 tons of aluminum per month to help build Soviet tanks. Soviet shortages of other nonferrous metals—including nickel, ferrochrome, and ferrosilicon—were filled by the Americans, who supplied Stalin with 800 tons per month of each of these important industrial metals. American shipments of specialty steels for military use were also sent to the Soviet Union. Roosevelt sent 4,000 to 5,000 tons per month of TNT and other high explosives to help the Soviets at Stalingrad. Finally, 300 tons of the weather-resistant vulcanized rubber compound called Vistanex was sent for use in the separation plates in Soviet tank and airplane batteries.[24]

      American lend-lease aid was crucial in helping the Red Army defeat the Germans at Stalingrad. Such lend-lease aid included 70,000 trucks and jeeps, 500,000 tons of American aviation and motor fuel and lubricants, 4,469 tanks and gun carriers, 1,663 warplanes, and tons of numerous food items to help feed Red Army soldiers. McMeekin writes,

“[I]t is an imperishable historical fact that the Anglo-American capitalism helped win the battle of Stalingrad.”[25]   

Lend-Lease Aid Wins War for Stalin 

      Lend-lease aid meant that if Stalin simply bided his time, the surpluses of American capitalism would allow his armored divisions to keep growing. From July 1, 1942 to June 30, 1943, the United States shipped more than 3.4 million tons of goods to Stalin, including barbed wire (4,000 tons shipped each month), 120,000 machine guns, another 120,000 Thompson submachine guns, anti-tank mines (60,000 per month), 5,117 anti-aircraft guns, 24 million square yards of tarpaulin, 75,000 tons of oil pipe and tubing, 181,366 tons of TNT, 173,000 field telephones, 580,000 miles of telephone wire, and 220,000 tons of petroleum products, most of it refined aviation gasoline. Numerous additional Allied lend-lease shipments were crucial in the battle at Kursk.[26]

      The Germans had nothing to match the sheer volume of supplies Stalin’s armies were receiving each month. By the time the Germans struck at Kursk in July 1943, ratios in manpower, tanks and self-propelled guns favored the Soviets by more than three to one, in warplanes by more than four to one, and in guns and artillery pieces by five or six to one. These advantages were compounded by the fact that the Russians could choose and fortify their ground for defense. Kursk was a decisive battle which marked the failure of the last major German offensive on the eastern front in the war. This victory was made possible by Allied lend-lease aid and complementary U.S.-British landings in Sicily.[27]

       Stalin was also given first priority in regard to foodstuffs. American civilians were forced to provide Russians with food at a time of strict wartime rationing back home. So colossal were shipments of lend-lease foodstuffs to Stalin that by 1943 many American store shelves were emptied of essentials. Some 8,000 rationing boards in the United States during the war restricted consumption of everything from grain, milk, butter, and sugar to fuel, rubber, tires, fabrics and shoes. The most famous lend-lease foodstuff given to Russians during the war—Spam—was so highly prized by the Red Army that the American pork and meat-canning industry was reshaped to meet Soviet demand. A special manual was prepared and distributed to each Red Army unit explaining what foods were in the cans and packets they had received from the American lend-lease program. [28]

December 28, 1942

      Numerous American plants and refineries were dismantled and shipped to the Soviet Union. These include a Ford Tire Plant, a Douglas oil refinery, 11 hydroelectric plants, and a steel rail mill. The volume of U.S. industrial equipment shipped from July 1, 1943 to June 30, 1944 was 739,000 tons, with a dollar value of $401 million. McMeekin writes:

“Even before the third protocol period began in July 1943, Stalin’s procurement agents had already requisitioned $500 million worth of ‘industrial equipment’—an amount comparable to $50 billion today—consisting of everything from machine tools, electric furnaces, motors, cranes, and hoists to oil refineries, tire manufacturing plants, and aluminum and steel-rolling mills.”[29]

      Remarkably, lend-lease aid to the Soviet Union continued after Germany had been defeated. On May 10—two days after VE Day—U.S. President Harry Truman signed a presidential directive curtailing Soviet aid shipments sent to Europe, since the war in Europe was over. This reasonable directive was vigorously protested by Soviet officials. On May 27, 1945, Hopkins met with Stalin in Moscow. Stalin lit into Hopkins over the “scornful and abrupt,” “unfortunate and brutal” way Truman had cut off the supplies Stalin had been receiving. Stalin had the audacity to tell Hopkins that if American refusal to continue lend-lease aid was designed as pressure on the Russians, then it was a fundamental mistake that might result in reprisals.[30]

Mao at Stalin’s side on a ceremony arranged for Stalin’s 71th birthday in Moscow in December 1949.

Conclusion   

      The approximately $11 billion in military weapons, industrial equipment, technology and intellectual property given to Stalin was crucial in helping him win the war. The Soviet wartime debts were written off in 1951 at two cents on the dollar. By contrast, Great Britain paid its debts in full, with interest, until 2006.[31]

      When measured by territory conquered and war booty received, Stalin was the victor in both Europe and Asia. No one else came close. The three Axis powers were totally crushed. France was a withered wreck and soon lost its empire. Great Britain was bankrupt and moribund. Although the United States was relatively untouched by the war at home and emerged in a strong position, the Cold War required a gargantuan expenditure over decades, until the Soviet Union eventually collapsed in 1991.[32]

      The effect of lend-lease aid to Stalin was the expansion of Communism and the Soviet Union’s empire. McMeekin writes:

      The ultimate price of victory was paid by the tens of millions of involuntary subjects of Stalin’s satellite regimes in Europe and Asia, including Maoist China, along with the millions of Soviet dissidents, returned Soviet POWs, and captured war prisoners who were herded into Gulag camps from the Arctic gold and platinum mines of Vorkuta to the open-air uranium strip mines of Stavropol and Siberia. For subjects of his expanding slave empire, Stalin’s war did not end in 1945. Decades of oppression and new forms of terror were still to come.[33]                                                                                                                        

See below for detail or view here

Endnotes


[1] McMeekin, Sean, Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II, New York: Basic Books, 2021, pp. 43-44.

[2] Ibid, pp. 44-45.

[3] Ibid., pp. 49, 132.

[4] Ibid., p. 527.

[5] Ibid., pp. 47-48.

[6] Ibid., p. 110.

[7] Ibid., p. 350.

[8] Ibid., pp. 352, 354.

[9] Ibid., p. 360.

[10] Ibid, pp. 364-365.

[11] Ibid., pp. 370-373.

[12] Ibid., p. 368.

[13] Ibid., p. 381.

[14] Ibid., pp. 367-368.

[15] Ibid., pp. 390-391.

[16] Ibid., pp. 395-396.

[17] Ibid., p. 396.

[18] Ibid., pp. 397-398.

[19] Ibid., pp. 401-402.

[20] Ibid., pp. 404-405.

[21] Ibid., p. 416.

[22] Ibid., p. 418.

[23] Ibid., pp. 423-424.

[24] Ibid., pp. 425-426.

[25] Ibid., pp. 430-432.

[26] Ibid., p. 462.

[27] Ibid., pp. 436, 466, 473.

[28] Ibid., pp. 522-526.

[29] Ibid., pp. 527-528.

[30] Ibid., pp. 633-634.

[31] Ibid., pp. 658-659.

[32] Ibid., pp. 663-665.

[33] Ibid., pp. 665-666.

Share, re-blog and print options:

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Linde says:

    The only explanation for the Lend Lease Program or the findings of the Reece Committee or Senator McCarthy’s list of 200 State Dept . Communists is: subversion. The Long March of subversion of what Anatoliy Golitsyn called: “the permanent, world-wide Revolution” had already captured the State Dept by WWII.

    The Communist Bloc nations were the military base of its armed aggression until the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet in 1993. But before they dissolved, they elected their Praesidium – Gorbachev and he oversaw the transition to the UN as the base of the Revolution for its end stage.

    The US has been undergoing Communist subversion since the Bolshevik Revolution which was assisted greatly by President Woodrow Wilson who secretly sent the Marines to defeat the White Russian army, thus preventing it from marching on Moscow and hanging the Jewish / Yiddish Bolsheviks from every lamp post in the Kremlin Square. And when the Red Army promptly began the invasion of Europe in force 1919, the UK and the US stood by.
    These two subverted, crypto Communist powers never lifted a finger for the independent nation of Ukraine which fell to the Soviet invasion or Poland which still calls that war “The War of the Annihilation’.

    By World War II the Communist subversion had covert control of all branches of government in the US. And the Americans who understood this were in Counter Revolution. If they were waging CR within government structures they were dealt with severely like Senator Joseph McCarthy who went after ‘home grown traitors’ – and that was just in the State Dept.
    https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/investigations/mccarthy-hearings/communists-in-government-service.htm

    There is a long list of American names who were ‘taken out’ by the Revolution and its assets which created the Deep State throughout all government structures. The decision to cede all of Central Europe to Stalin at Yalta. Lend Lease to Stalin. No-win wars – MacArthur, Le May, Westmoreland all stood down. The Johnson government collaboration with Israel on the Israeli attack upon the USS Liberty / cover-up. The betrayal of nations that were actually fighting the armed aggression of the permanent , world-wide Revolution probably was the worst of all of it.

  2. Linde says:

    John Wear has certainly got a hold of some important subject matter. I read his review with great interest.
    .
    World War II has many ‘imponderables’. Such as : both the USSR and Nazi Germany invaded Poland. But the UK declared war only on Nazi Germany.

    Antony C. Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler covers the finance of the Nazi Party beginning with the late 1920s. But Hitler took charge of the Party in 1921 with a lot of money for propaganda and recruitment.

    When this kind of stuff starts appearing in the historical narrative – then you know you dealing with a covert, centrally organised power.

    As JFK stated in his address at the Waldorf Astoria in 1961: “We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy …” That racially monolithic conspiracy of the Money Power organised WWI for the destruction of the last remnant of the old Holy Roman Empire (Austria Hungary) and as the springboard for their Bolshevik takeover of Russia. Their Third ComIntern also launched the invasion of Europe in force. But Poland stopped that invasion at the Vistula.

    They organised WW II as the inauguration of the permanent world-wide Communist Revolution under the Fourth ComIntern.

    There is no way this power was ever going to permit free and independent nations in Africa with statecraft capable of integrating tribal populations under self-rule and investing them the social progress and development that only Western nations can create.

    Rhodesia was absolutely in the right to contest the armed aggression of the Communist Revolution in Africa by force of arms and beat the crap out of them. The RF was not strategizing a no-win war for Communist expansion like ZOG US or ZOG UK. The Rhodesian forces fighting their war of independence intended to draw the line and halt the expansion of Communism.

    • Editor says:

      If we consider the Rothschild/Anglo-Boer War as the real first World War the destruction by the Money Powers starts to make more sense, IMO. A massive Empire comprised of several countries including India, Canada, Australia, England, Scotland, etc went to war against a miniscule family farming population, the Boer. The Boer are the only ethnic Europeans in Africa to not have “colonial” ties and have no “right of return” to any country, it’s truly survive or die for them in Africa.

      The Money Powers appear to have relied on “decolonization” leading to other ethnic Europeans to flee back to their homelands. Consider their great interest in taking the German territories in Africa post-WWI, the German people left Africa. The Belgium’s fled the Congo, the Portuguese fled Angola Mozambique, etc. Meanwhile they were populating Africa with their Communist fanatics from eastern Europe (but they were not ethnic Europeans who they have systematically treated as the enemy as they did in Russia). People do not appreciate the significance of the establishment of the first Communist Party outside Europe in 1924 being in South Africa. They should, that was by design, they needed a developed nation to funnel their covert op’s through, call it covert communist colonization.

      Once they had broken the Boer -only by resorting to the use of Concentration Death Camps for women and children- they had set the scene to extract the European ‘colonizers’ and turn Africa into permanent chaos ripe for the plunder (while draining the pockets of Western nations for “aid”). The following 2 world wars sealed the deal and all was looking good for the Money Powers until the Rhodesian’s shocked the world with their Unilateral Declaration of Independence. For the second time a tiny white population in Africa put up a hell of a fight and gave them a real fright.

      Linde you will also appreciate this fact based article by John Wear:
      http://www.wearswar.com/2022/04/29/jewish-involvement-in-the-bolshevik-revolution/

  3. Linde says:

    Thank you Editor. I will read it. I think it will contribute to a a thesis that is emerging across the Rhodesiasphere.

    For the permanent, world-wide Communist Revolution (with its Praesidium now in the UN), the European civilisation in Africa was to be the template for the take-down of all European nations. Sally-Ann Lowe has argued this in several essays for RR.

    When the ICC upheld the architects of the SA republic : Verwoerd and Buthelezi on Apartheid
    https://www.nytimes.com/1966/07/19/archives/verwoerd-calls-ruling-a-victory-for-south-africa-prime-minister.html
    the Oppenheimer branch of the central banking cartel began to migrate African , specifically Bantu populations , from the failed Marxist states and bloodbaths of the Communist Revolution into South Africa.

    These demographics could not possibly be assimilated to the social structure of the republic. They had no relation to the land and the Black populations whose lands, social progress and development (their way) were guaranteed to them would not have them in the Homelands. Their only option was to fight the White SA population for the White social infrastructure.

    And in Rhodesia, Mozambique and SA all the Gook veterans from all over the Communist world could be resettled: Cubans, North Koreans, North Vietnamese, Chinese, Argentinians, Venzuelans as well as other ANC alphabet soup veterans from Africa itself.

    I never thought about it this way before but the Communist Revolution might actually have begun in Africa with the Boer War. This is worth consideration.

    The Owners of the City of London Corporation and its Bank are The Owners of the Revolution. Undoubtedly. http://www.wearswar.com is making a contribution here. Perhaps Rhodes saw that his idea of British Empire as a civilzing mission to Africa was at cross purposes with the Empire of the City. With the diamond mines and gold mines of the Boer Republics falling into the hands of The City it would make sense for Rhodes to back the Pioneer Column into Zambesia.

    The dictate that Europe be stripped of its colonies was a dictate of the Third, Fourth ComInterns and the UN.

    Now we are seeing the purpose was always re-colonization for the vassal nations for the Communist Bloc – which are , of course, their colonies. Only the Communist Bloc is permitted to have colonies under the UN. And the populations of those failed Marxist states would then be inserted into the Western nations to defeat the Counter Revolution by demographics.

    • Editor says:

      The works of Arthur Kemp The March of the Titans and others are very relevant. Throughout the world the ancient relics and tombs of Red headed peoples, Blue eyed peoples, Blonde peoples are shrouded in secrecy thanks to the Smithsonian Institute and the so-called First Nation people laws that defy all standards of Western scientific inquiry. For instance ancient bones cannot be DNA tested out of “respect” for non-white tribes despite clear evidence of there being red haired tribes in America and New Zealand! In China they simply shut down excavations revealing ancient Red heads potentially bringing civilization to their lands.

      By rewriting the history of “first nation” peoples to exclude ethnic-Europeans the Marxist Revolution has its race war. Just as powerful are the BBC and Hollyweird creeps reinventing the original Vikings as being black and Britain being built by black Kings and Queens! In other words, they are declaring that there is no place on Earth that ethnic Europeans are indigenous to, we simply dropped out of the sky like alien invaders! Thus we deserve genocide and Marxist Rule has proved to be highly effective whether by hot war or by the long march through the institutions and “Free Trade Agreements”.

  4. Linde says:

    Or maybe we just sprang up from holes in the ground around the great Wakanda.

    I am trying to follow all this through the UN Global Compact on Migration and UNDRIP – declaration on the rights of indigenous persons. This is where I think the hammer will fall on the Whites who are the heritage and founding stock of government and social order on continents other than Europe. Clearly the Blacks and the Browns don’t want it. OK they don’t want it. So don’t come and get it. But..noooo. A White majority still remains in those countries, so it will have to be quickly overwhelmed by a roll tide of Open Borders tsunamis who don’t want Western civilization but feel entitled to the gravy train of welfare benefits.

    And in nations where the Europeans are indigenous, they are to be Kalergified – also with human tsunamis from the failed Marxist states in the developing world. The European culture is to be appropriated by migrants who have been massively enabled and shoe horned into the host European nations for Marxist deconstruction. In the government Communist schools, every month is Black history month. Every day is Nelson Mandela appreciation day. The kids will have to learn all about how Britain was built by the Black Cheddar men. You would not believe how these guys went in for Gothic and Palladian architecture.

    In nations where there is a White majority demographic, the Revolution / UN will back the indigenous population , however small. Majority / minority; indigenous / non-indigenous are all relative and irrelevant. Destroy the Whites is the thing.

    As in the US, Australia and Canada the archeological artifacts of the prior White occupation and civilization will be censored and denied. There are definitely pyramids in Australia. And I expect they will have the kind of grave goods these pyramids always have.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhSf4MBemdg
    Sesame Street Introduces ‘Todd’ A White Male Muppet Who is Blamed for Everything.

Leave a Reply to Linde Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll Up